by Dr. Sidney G. Cox, Ph.D., ND
“These findings are so troubling that we expected major
media outlets in America to sound an alarm, calling for an
immediate reevaluation of current preventive health care
practices. But 4 years after publication of our study, this has not
happened. Could it be because, according to Robert Kennedy,
Jr., about 70% of advertising revenue on network news comes
from drug companies? In fact, the president of a network news
division admitted that he would fire a host who brought on a
guest that led to loss of a pharmaceutical account. That may
be why the mainstream media won’t give equal time to stories
about problems with vaccine safety.”
Neil Z. Miller,
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 21 Number 2 Summer 2016
Again we are faced with the fact that the media has an agenda that no longer addresses the needs and concerns of the public. Whether one is a Left Wing advocate or a Right Wing advocate is does not matter as the truth, or lack thereof, had it’s effect even though the outcome was not intended. During all of this, it is the public that the media pretends to serve. The question is, since the public has been abandoned by the news agencies, who are these so called informers of the news serving and why? It is as plain as the scratching of one palm or another. Simply look amid their incomplete reports and skewed stories and you find a mixed variety of advertisements. And amid those paid time blocks are the true sinister perverts lurking in the background of control.
In the world of “capitalism”, it is capital (money) that controls. It controls what you see and what you hear. It controls your food, the air you breath, and the water you drink, all of which has been declining in quality and value for many over the last 100 years. The media, in reality, is like all businesses, driven by profit and not by truth and morals. In the same sense, you can see that even non-profits such as religious, social and political entities are driven by capital and not by truth and morals in many cases. So it is very easy to understand that profits are the end “truth” for all of these organizations.
That being said, it is also true that the media is an extortion operation as well as an extortion victim. This two-way street is a vicious and cutthroat machinery that has left the original purpose of the “people’s” media in the dust of a forgotten road, no longer a voice of hope, understanding and possible direction.
The greatest example of this relationship with “capital”, the GOD of “CAPITALISM”, and the truth, visa viz, reporting of the news, is that the truth is only implied as a traditionally vested interest of society, a pretense of some reality that no longer exists, and the salaried (capital guaranteed) reporters of this morass of excrement called news should consider a worthwhile career. The TRUTH is that….. the “NEWS” is really getting “OLD”.
Let me regress in time to an example of how the media operates in a form of good and evil. During the age of tobacco interests, the media was interested in providing a vehicle for seduction by the tobacco industry by providing not only lucrative contract ads to promote deadly tobacco products but also the production of programming that presented tobacco as a “cool” past time. The seductive illusion of the “got it together” anarchist with a cigarette hanging from the mouth was common. The appeal of inclusion into the anti-establishment was adorned with such decorations. It made many “feel” as if they were included or accepted into a group that cared about them. Illusions are all the same.
The government agencies of health and the medical field had been touting the deadly health ramifications of smoking. Of course, the main channel of focus was lung cancer as the fear mongering center of attention. In reality, the primary concern of American business was the effect of cigarette smoking on the productivity of the populace. There were many studies conducted on the effect of cigarettes on the productivity of workers which in turn had its effect on the profits of companies. Higher slave (oops, I should have said slave wage worker) productivity is the motivation behind increased wealth for the wealthy. Keep in mind that wealth is the equivalent of control. Wealth is fine but only if it is used in a way to improve the lives of others at least to some extent. For the most part, this is not always the case.
It was the banning of tobacco advertising that turned the tide against the industry. Those in power knew that if the advertising money was denied from the media then the media would not only be unable to promote tobacco but would also turn on the industry, which they did like wolves in winter. You see, the media had no reason (money) to protect the purveyors of nicotine because the industry could not pay their extortion money. It is the slickest racketeering operation in the country and nothing is done about it.
Enter the medical industry/pharmaceutical industry. How many ads related to drugs do you see which advocate a need but at the same time warn against side effects that could include major health damage or even death? Would anyone in their right mind take some of this stuff..seizures, Tuberculosis, Kidney or Liver Damage, and even death in any variety of ways. Oh yes, you can even go blind! In the above report it also stated:
“Our study showed that infants who receive several vaccines
concurrently, as recommended by CDC, are significantly more
likely to be hospitalized or die when compared with infants
who receive fewer vaccines simultaneously. It also showed
that reported adverse effects were more likely to lead to
hospitalization or death in younger infants.”
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
Volume 21 Number 2 Summer 2016
The media also fired salvo after salvo at Donald Trump who refused to spend any sizeable amount of money for campaign ads compared to the 100s of millions of dollars spent by Sec. of State Hillary Clinton. Now, what are the odds that the payola potential of Trump would have changed things to some significant degree at least on some media platforms?
If you a wondering why the polls had it wrong then consider how poles manipulate and alter thinking. Probably as much as electronic voting machines are bullet proof from manipulation.
“In the 38,801 VAERS reports we analyzed, 26,408 infants
were younger than six months. After receiving one or more
vaccine doses, 1,623 of those infants died: a mortality rate of
6.1%. The remaining 12,393 infants were between six months
and one year of age. After receiving one or more vaccine doses,
258 of them died: 2.1%. The mortality rate for vaccinated infants
younger than six months was significantly higher than the
mortality rate for vaccinated infants aged between six months
and one year, with an RR = 3.0 (95% CI, 2.6-3.4). Infants who had
an adverse event reported to VAERS were significantly more
likely to be hospitalized or die if they were younger rather thanolder at the time of vaccination.”
Next, they will have a vaccination for our minds to vaccinate us from the truth.
Dr. Sidney G. Cox Welcome to the world of information. It has been taught over the centuries that knowledge is power. In this day and age, information, thus knowledge is more accessible than ever a…
Can you imagine a day when the vitamins you consume will only be available by prescription? And at drug prices? In the U.S., sales of dietary supplements totaled nearly $37 billion in 2014, while the number of supplement users in the U.S. has reached 68 percent of the population.2
In February, I exposed how the Canadian Broadcast (CBC) News, The New York Times and PBS/Frontline all appeared to be part of this coordinated campaign against supplements.3
In November 2015, CBC News published a report in which they accused a number of supplement makers of failing to live up to label claims. By the end of January, the news agency was forced to retract its report as their lab tests were proven inaccurate.
Following on the heels of this debacle, Frontline aired a program focused on concerns that consumers may endanger their health by taking vitamins and supplements.
Our initial story outing the glaring bias and the subsequent public outcry led to PBS Ombudsman Michael Getler doing a detailed review of the program.
In conclusion, Getler admitted that vitamin supplements do not pose “a public health calamity” as the show had unfairly insinuated. I published a follow-up on Frontline’s hit piece on February 22, in which I further clarified the issue of how supplements are regulated.
“When you have power you don’t have to tell the truth. That’s a rule that’s been working in this world for generations. And there are a great many people who don’t tell the truth when they are in power in administrative positions.”
—Dr. Dean Burk former head of National Cancer Institute Research
This is a reproduction of an article from Natural News
It contains information relevant to the cancer epidemic that has risen over the last 50 years in this country and gradually throughout the world.
The true story of SV40, the cancer-causing virus hidden in polio vaccines
Wednesday, June 29, 2011 by: J. D. Heyes
(NaturalNews) Poliomylitis, or polio for short, is a disease that has been around since ancient times, and despite the medical advances we have made in the United States in terms of regular and natural health, there is still no cure for this dreaded, disabling disease.
An infectious viral affliction that attacks nerve cells and, at times, the body’s central nervous system, polio causes a phenomenon known as muscle wasting (a decrease in the mass of muscle), and can also cause paralysis and death.
“Since 1900 there had been cycles of epidemics, each seeming to get stronger and more disastrous. The disease, whose early symptoms are like the flu, struck mostly children, although adults, including Franklin Roosevelt, caught it too,” said a report in the journal A Science Odyssey.
In 1952 that all changed, when Dr. Jonas Salk, a medical student and virus researcher, developed a vaccine against polio that, two years later, was accepted for testing nationwide. The principle behind the vaccine was simple and familiar: Like the vaccine that had been developed to fight smallpox, the polio vaccine introduced a small amount of the virus into the body, which then developed antibodies and an ability to fight off more powerful strains of the disease.
Admittedly, Salk’s vaccine logged early success; some 60-70 percent of those vaccinated did not develop the disease. But it also saw some early problems. About 200 people who had been vaccinated got the disease, and 11 of them died, forcing a halt to all testing. Once it was determined that a faulty, poorly manufactured batch of the vaccine was the cause of those cases, stricter production standards were implemented and full-scale vaccinations nationwide resumed once more. Four million vaccines were given by 1955; by 1959, 90 countries were using it.
That said, those early cases were far from the last time the vaccine killed. In fact, throughout its history of use, Salk’s polio vaccine left a path of death its wake.
A deadly discovery
Production and nationwide distribution of the polio vaccine was in full force by the end of the 1950s, but between 1959 and 1960 Dr. Bernice Eddy, a researcher with the National Institute of Health (NIH), made a startling discovery.
While examining the minced kidney cells of rhesus monkeys – from which the the polio vaccines were derived – she discovered “that the cells would die without any apparent cause,” according to a report by Michael E. Horwin, M.A., J.D., published in the Nov. 3, 2003, issue of the Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology.
Dr. Eddy discovered that the cells would die without any apparent cause. She then took suspensions of the cellular material from these kidney cell cultures and injected them into hamsters. Cancers grew in the hamsters. Shortly thereafter, scientists at the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. discovered what would later be determined to be the same virus identified by Eddy. This virus was named Simian Virus 40 or SV40 because it was the 40th simian virus found in monkey kidney cells.
A few months later, in 1960, Dr. Benjamin Sweet and Dr. Maurice Hillman, both Merck scientists, published their findings. They wrote that such viruses were common in that particular breed of money, particularly in their kidneys:
The discovery of this new virus, the vacuolating agent, represents the detection for the first time of a hitherto “non-detectable” simian virus of monkey renal cultures and raises the important question of the existence of other such viruses . . . . As shown in this report, all 3 types of Sabin’s live poliovirus vaccine, now fed to millions of persons of all ages, were contaminated with vacuolating virus…
The term “vacuolating virus” is another name for SV40, Horwin said, adding that later, in 1962, Dr. Eddy published more findings regarding the link between cancer and SV40:
The (SV40) virus was injected at once into 13 newborn hamsters and 10 newborn mice. Subcutaneous neoplasms indistinguishable from those induced by the rhesus monkey kidney extracts developed in 11 of the 13 hamsters between 156 and 380 days…
Chorus of Denial
Shortly after Dr. Eddy’s discovery was made public, a host of high-powered researchers and scientists, including Dr. Salk himself, stepped forward to defend the polio vaccine.
An Associated Press story published April 7, 1963 (“New Data Ties Cancer, Virus”), featured quotes from a number of scientists who all pointed out that, to date, no link between SV40 and cancer had been discovered in humans.
“It seems to me that if danger were attached to SV-40, we would recognize it by now,” the AP quoted Dr. Michael B. Shimkin of the National Cancer Institute as saying. Dr. Shimkin went on to say that “the public can be reassured” because careful studies “have produced no evidence whatsoever that during the last seven years there has been an increase in leukemia or cancer which can be attributed to SV-40.”
Dr. Joseph L. Melnick of Baylor University in Texas agreed, saying that there had been no link discovered, a claim echoed by Dr. Salk, according to the AP story. Even Dr. Eddy “said this virus is not known to induce tumors in man or monkeys,” the report said.
By 1960, Horwin notes, the Salk injectable polio vaccine had been given to about 98 million American children and adults, while Sabin’s oral version had been given to about 10,000 Americans and tens of millions of Soviet citizens, where trials had been conducted. “It was estimated that 10% to 30% of the vaccines contained live SV40,” he wrote, noting that despite the link discovered by Dr. Eddy, no federal agency and no new federal rules that regulated the manufacture, sale and distribution of vaccines required makers of the polio vaccine to “discard their SV40-contaminated poliovirus seeds which were the source for all subsequent polio vaccines.”
Subsequent federal testing of the vaccines, which occurred in the mid-1960s, were also inadequate, Horwin notes, because “the fourteen-day SV40 tests were not long enough to detect the virus.” Yet in the years afterward, the incidence of pediatric cancer increased.
“Indeed, the pediatric cancer rate continued to climb through the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s and 90’s,” he wrote.
That claim is backed by other research as well.
“Whether childhood cancer is becoming more common is a controversial question among scientists,” writes Amy D. Kyle, for EnviroHealthPolicy.net.
“Data from the cancer tracking systems in the US suggest that childhood cancer is increasing,” she adds, noting a graph which tracked the increase in pediatric cancer rates in the latter part of the 20th century.
The American Childhood Cancer Association goes a step further, stating that according to statistics, cancer is the number one killer of children in the U.S.
In 2005 the National Network for Immunization Information published a somewhat conflicting report regarding a link between SV40 and increased cancer rates.
“Although SV40 has biological properties consistent with a cancer-causing virus, it has not been conclusively established whether it has caused cancer in humans,” said the report. “Epidemiological studies of groups of people who received polio vaccine during 1955-1963 do not show an increased cancer risk.”
But later, the same report seems to contradict itself:
However, a number of studies have found SV40 in certain forms of cancer in humans, such as mesotheliomas – rare tumors located in the lungs – brain and bone tumors; the virus has also been found to be associated with some types of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
In 2002, the IOM’s (Institute of Medicine) Immunization Safety Review Committee considered that the available data was inadequate to conclude whether or not the contaminated polio vaccine may have caused cancer. Because there is biological evidence supporting the theory that SV40-contamination of polio vaccines could contribute to human cancers,the committee recommended continued public health attention in the form of policy analysis, communication, and targeted biological research.
A corresponding study by the National Academy of Sciences, conducted at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was similarly “inconclusive.” A panel of medical and scientific experts charged with examining any potential link between SV40 and increased cancer risk concluded:
Available evidence is “inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between SV40-containing polio vaccines and cancer;”
The “biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming virus,” one that is capable of “inducing malignant transformation of animal cells in culture;”
The “biological evidence is moderate that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions;”
The “biological evidence is moderate that SV40 exposure from the polio vaccine is related to SV40 infection in humans.”
In the “Significance Assessment” portion of its conclusions, the panel’s final report said, “The committee concludes that concerns about exposure to SV40 through inadvertent contamination of polio vaccines are significant because of the seriousness of cancers as the possible adverse health outcomes and because of the continuing need to ensure and protect public trust in the nation’s immunization program.”
While the panel did not recommend “a policy review of polio vaccine by any of the national or federal vaccine advisory bodies” because the current polio vaccine is free of SV40, it did recommend “development of sensitive and specific serological tests” for the virus, as well as “development and use of … standardized techniques for SV40 detection.
Real Cases – Real Conclusions
In a July 15, 2001 report, the San Francisco Chronicle published a story detailing an increased concern among researchers that the SV40 virus found in those early polio vaccines was indeed responsible for higher cancer rates.
“For four decades, government officials have insisted that there is no evidence the simian virus called SV40 is harmful to humans. But in recent years, dozens of scientific studies have found the virus in a steadily increasing number of rare brain, bone and lung-related tumors – the same malignant cancer SV40 causes in lab animals,” the report said. “Even more troubling, the virus has been detected in tumors removed from people never inoculated with the contaminated vaccine, leading some to worry that those infected by the vaccine might be spreading SV40.”
Dr. Michele Carbone of Loyola University Medical Center in Maywood, Ill., told the paper he believed the virus was carcinogenic in humans.
“We need to be creating therapies for people who have these cancers, and now we may be able to because we have a target – SV40,” he said.
Others say the few government studies regarding the potential link have been flawed.
“The government has not sponsored any real research. Here’s something possibly affecting millions of Americans, and they’re indifferent,” Dr. Adi Gazdar, a University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center cancer researcher, said. “Maybe they don’t want to find out.”
Barbara Loe Fisher, president and co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, a non-profit organization which advocates vaccine safety, testified before the House Government Reform Committee’s subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness in September 2003 that
[T]oday, U.S. federal health agencies admit the following two facts: (1) Salk polio vaccine released for public use between 1955 and 1963 was contaminated with SV40; and SV40 has been proven to cause cancer in animals.
Continuing, Fisher said that at a 1997 conference on SV40 and human cancers held by the National Institutes of Health which she attended, “there was no disagreement among both government and non-government scientists about these two facts.
The only disagreement was whether SV40 was actually being identified in the cancerous tumors of children and adults alive today and, if it was, whether the monkey virus was in fact responsible for their cancer. Non-government scientists working in independent labs around the world said, ‘Yes.’ But the scientists connected with the U.S. government said ‘No.'”
Fisher went on to say that “credentialed non-government scientists in multiple labs around the world continue to identify SV40 in human brain and lung cancers of children and adults and are finding that SV40 is also associated with bone cancers and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas.”
Despite ongoing denials, an increasing number of researchers continue to maintain that not only is there a bona fide link between Salk’s SV40-tainted vaccines and cancer, that federal government officials and agencies responsible for ensuring the safety of such vaccines – then and now – are loathe to admit it, perhaps because they fear the fallout in terms of lawsuits and lost credibility.
But eventually there is likely to be enough evidence to force a change of heart, because based on what’s still being discovered about the link, the issue won’t go away anytime soon.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032854_SV40_polio_vaccines.html#ixzz3rkfj8THN
by Dr. Sidney G. Cox, PhD ND
I was reading a newspaper editorial-page this morning as well as the political section where a torrent of articles concerning the so-called takeover of the Republican Party by Donald Trump was being Trumpeted by writers as the destruction of the two-party political system in America.
Just a day or so ago a politician of the established status-quo made the comment about running as an independent and defended the notion with the historical reference to the 1860 presidential election that featured four parties and generated the well-known presidential victor Abraham Lincoln. Therefore, having more than two parties actually produced an excellent result in his eyes. In the modern day political arena we are told that the two party system is the only way to the light and salvation when in truth it is the simplest way to control as well as divide the masses. Today the advocates of the established GOP and Democratic parties are fuming over the fact that their establishment representatives are being beaten handily or Trumped by establishment outsiders who are voicing an opinion that Washington is broken and needs to be fixed.
On one side of the aisle we find a candidate being labeled as Socialist as if you are a member of the Communist party if you advocate for fairness, justice and the end of corporate interference in the people’s government. Of course in America there are those who only believe in the 1st Amendment when it is convenient.
The words of these two new candidates sends a shudder of fear through career politicians and members of the good old boy puppets who have been running the government in a manner which has been lining the pockets of a select group of people and at the same time have created continuous wars throughout the world over the last 40 years in the name of democracy. This good old boys group, and then might I add a few good old girls to make it “look good”, become really upset when they see their apple cart being turned over and all the rotten apples spilling onto the ground, for y’all know that rotten apples are only good for two things: making apple wine and apple brandy or for making vinegar. Of course the alcohol spirits are for themselves and the vinegar is for the masses. Reminds me of a story of biblical proportions.
The newspapers with their editorials and stories containing fear mongering, nay saying and rhetoric in regards to the new candidates and politics is nothing more than the same screaming mad men who believe that people have no right to rule themselves and that only they and their cohorts are bright enough and capable enough to rule over them. And when the media is controlled by wealthy corporations who use their advertising dollars as leverage to have their stories told instead of the truth because the average American can’t afford a newspaper subscription let alone pay millions of influence dollars in advertising for radio and TV outlets, it is no wonder that so many are actually clueless as to what is really taking place. The 10th amendment organization has been advocating for years to ratify an amendment to the Constitution that removes the person status decision from corporations that was wrongly upheld by the Supreme Court. I find it interesting that a corporation can not vote but has “person” status under the constitution. Could it be because corporations are under age and not mature enough?
Each day the liberties of Americans and others around the world are being reduced and otherwise placed in jeopardy as a result of the theft of American wealth and the destruction of America values as the public stares blankly at the backs of each others heads in anticipation of the next step, blindly going where most men have gone before, without thought and without reason as long as the wallet in their pocket or purse has some debt notes in it for gas and rent.
With the fear of the establishment rising, the attacks upon Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders will become more intense in the attempt to influence the voters and sway those from supporting the outsiders. When in reality what they will not report is the fact that there is a revolution taking place in America and that people are finally waking up to the fact that their country is slowly being stolen from them and that their wealth is being diminished and opportunity is being destroyed and limited. They are waking up to the fact that the system has been rigged and that they’re not going to be able to tell their children and their grandchildren that America is a land of prosperity because there is no certainty anymore.
I go back to an article I read once where a reporter, undetected as such, was standing among a group of businessmen just after the first electronic voting machines were approved for use in the United States. The president of the Diebold Corporation made a comment to a few others within earshot of the reporter to the effect that, “now we will finally be able to control the elections”. To what extent might we expect the powers behind the Curtain of Oz to allow what is going on to continue before they do something about it? Those with Satanic intent have no limits as to what they do. Justification in their own minds all that is necessary. We as a people think that we can trust others to do things for us. But then again we ourselves justify our own wrong doings and so we ourselves need to clean our own houses in the process. We also tend to look outward before, if ever, looking inward. Good luck America, the time of pretense is over.
Dr. Sidney G. Cox
Welcome to the world of information.
It has been taught over the centuries that knowledge is power.
In this day and age, information, thus knowledge is more accessible than ever and therefore the power of each one of us has the potential to change the world as never before. The problem is, so many of us don’t take the time to gather information and study it. We are too busy taking care of the massive amount of duties and tasks we perceive to be necessary to fulfill our common lives. In order to fit in to the social culture we MUST attempt to do everything we can to “accomplish” success in all matter of events, networks and financial status models. We must fit in and we must compete with each other as adversaries. The culture dictates that the automobile we drive or the house we call our home or the position of so called responsibility is the measure of who or what we are. The fact is most of us simply do not have much of anything of importance that is not attached to debt, taxes and potential loss at any given moment. Even life is too fragile to be counted on for certain. Competition is the name of the game. But while we worry about what someone thinks about us as a social status object we fail to realize that only our personal self worth has value. Everything else is a learning tool. And the lesson is how to navigate the world in peace and happiness without all the attachment garbage that clouds the way.
So we come to the point of why we need information and what we can do with it. The end goal is to wake up to reality so that we can change the world we have lived in for thousands of years into a better place. There is no reason for suffering in a world of abundance unless we care only about ourselves. We are being lied to. The Con-Artist is at every door and behind every corner. You and only you know the truth….about yourself…..the fact that you are part of the problem like all of us…..the fact that you have been duped by the clandestine thugs that rule the system and believe that their treachery is the “illuminated way”. They paint themselves in the excrement of self indulging knowledge in the name of superiority only to find themselves trampling upon the very souls of mankind whom they are obligated and entrusted to protect by the very Maker of Our Existence. We owe nothing to ourselves but to each other, no less than the sacrifice on our own living breath.
Share the information. Learn the truth about ourselves. Become the a martyr of the living and not of the dead of heart. Fear nothing as the world is simply the vibration of energy fields and eternity is it’s source.